By: Jonathan H. Freiberger Today’s BLOG article relates to Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc. v. Miglucci , a mortgage foreclosure action decided by the Appellate Division, Third Department, on October 17, 2024. The Court in Miglucci determined that the accrual date of a cause of action for the foreclosure of a reverse mortgage generally accrues upon the death of the borrower. In 2008, the Miglucci borrower borrowed money from the lender and secured her repayment obligations

By: Jonathan H. Freiberger As readers of this BLOG know, we frequently write about issues relating to mortgage foreclosure. We have also written numerous articles relating to the recently enacted FAPA. See, e.g., < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> and < here =">here</a>"> . Today’s BLOG article relates to U.S. Bank National Association v. Lynch , a case decided by the Appellate Division, Third Department, on October 24, 2024, and in which it

By: Jeffrey M. Haber Statutes of limitations limit the time within which a defendant can be held liable for any type of alleged wrongdoing. Plaintiffs who do not pursue their rights within the limitations period will find the courthouse doors closed to their claims. For this reason, whether the statute of limitations has run is an important issue to consider before commencing an action. Important to this consideration is ascertaining when the claim sought to be asserted accru

By: Jeffrey M. Haber In today’s post, we examine Student Loan Solutions, LLC v. Colon , 2024 N.Y. Slip Op. 05125 (2d Dept. Oct. 16, 2024) ( here ), a case involving the collection of student loan debt and the statute of limitations applicable to such collection efforts when the plaintiff is a nonresident suing on a cause of action accruing outside New York. As noted, Student Loan Solutions involved the collection of student loan debt. In 2007, defendants entered into a priva

By: Jonathan H. Freiberger A notice of pendency (or lis pendens ) is a provisional remedy available to litigants seeking a judgment that affects title to real property. 5303 Realty Corp. v. O&Y Equity Corp. , 64 N.Y.2d 313 (1984). The purpose of a notice of pendency is to put defendants and the world on notice of the full scope of the rights claimed by plaintiffs to defendants’ real property. Sjogren v. Land Assoc., LLC , 223 A.D.3d 963, 965 (3 rd Dep’t 2024). Notices of pen

By: Jeffrey M. Haber Artificial intelligence (“AI”) is everywhere. A person cannot watch television, listen to a podcast or read a newspaper without hearing about AI. As a new and emerging technology, AI is exciting. Its applications and capabilities are endless. But, in the wrong hands, AI can be dangerous. Recently, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued an Investor Alert about AI and the risk of fraud (the “Alert”) ( here ). The SEC, along with the North Am

By: Jonathan H. Freiberger Because litigation can be a long and drawn-out process, it is not uncommon for litigants to die during the pendency of a lawsuit. In today’s BLOG article, we address the problems that may arise when a litigant dies. This BLOG has previously addressed this issue. See, e.g ., < here =">here</a>"> and < here =">here</a>"> . As previously noted in prior BLOG articles, in this context CPLR § 1015 – Substitution Upon Death – is instructive and provides:

By: Jeffrey M. Haber “Spoofing is a type of scam in which criminals attempt to obtain someone’s personal information by pretending to be a legitimate business, a neighbor, or some other innocent party.”  Spoofing can occur in any form of online communication, including emails, text messages, telephone calls, and websites.  Id . Although spoofing comes in many forms, the goal of spoofing is the same: to deceive people into divulging personal and/or financial information that t

By: Jeffrey M. Haber In today’s Fraud Notes, we examine two cases involving claims of fraudulent inducement and fraudulent concealment.   In Board of Mgrs. of 570 Broome Condominium v. Soho Broome Condos LLC , 2024 N.Y. Slip Op. 04804 (1st Dept. Oct. 3, 2024) ( here ), the Court examined a fraudulent inducement claim in connection with the purchase of a condominium unit. As discussed below, the Court held that plaintiff sufficiently alleged that defendant asserted affirmative