top of page
All Posts
Freiberger Haber’s Co-Founding Partners Once Again Recognized by Super Lawyers Magazine®
Melville, NY October 28, 2022 – Freiberger Haber LLP is pleased to announce that co-founding partners, Jonathan H. Freiberger and Jeffrey M. Haber, have been named by Super Lawyers magazine to be among the top lawyers in the New York metropolitan area. This is Mr. Freiberger’s third, and Mr. Haber’s eleventh, consecutive year of selection. Both Messrs. Freiberger and Haber were recognized for their work in business and commercial litigation. Super Lawyers Magazine® is an aff
admin
Oct 28, 20222 min read
Court finds Merchant Cash Advance Agreement Not to Be an Instrument for The Payment of Money Only
By: Jeffrey M. Haber In past articles, we have examined a motion under CPLR § 3213 ( see , e.g. , here , here , here , and here ). CPLR § 3213 is a procedural mechanism that allows a party to make a motion for summary judgment before filing a complaint in actions based upon “an instrument for the payment of money only or a judgment.” The purpose of the statute “is to provide an accelerated procedure where liability for a certain sum is clearly established by the instrument it
admin
Oct 26, 20224 min read
Enforcement News: SEC Files Charges Against A Real Estate Development Firm for Perpetrating A $600 Million Ponzi-like Scheme
By: Jeffrey M. Haber Tasty Minstrel Games LLC (“TMG”) is a company, located in Utah, that produces board games. 1 The best-known game released by TMG is Yokohama, a board game that takes place in the Meiji era of Japanese history. Another game that TMG produces is “Ponzi Scheme”. In Ponzi Scheme, players try to trick each other into funding fraudulent investments with the promise of extremely high returns. Like a real Ponzi scheme, the scheme works as long as new investors
admin
Oct 24, 20225 min read
NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS REAFFIRMS THAT, WITH RESPECT TO SHIFTING OF RESPONSIBILITY FOR PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY’S FEES, THE AMERICAN RULE RULES
By Jonathan H. Freiberger As discussed previously in this Blog < here =">here</a>"> , the first question asked by a potential client when consulting about a new litigation matter is “can we sue them for our legal fees.” Clients are often dismayed to learn that attorney’s fees are not generally recoverable in litigation under the “American Rule,” because “ n the United States, the prevailing litigant is ordinarily not entitled to collect a reasonable attorney fee from the los
admin
Oct 21, 20224 min read
Words Have Meaning
By: Jeffrey Haber In prior articles, we have talked about the importance of saying what you mean in a contract. ( E.g. , here and here .) When contracts are clear and unambiguous, the meaning ascribed to the words used therein will be enforced because they reflect the intent of the parties. Such was the case in Padron v. Granite Broadway Dev. LLC , 2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 05798 (1st Dept. Oct. 18, 2022). In Padron , plaintiff claimed that he sustained injuries when he slipped and
admin
Oct 19, 20224 min read
Issues of Fact Prevent Application of The Voluntary Payment Doctrine, Says The First Department
By: Jeffrey M. Haber The voluntary payment doctrine bars recovery of payments voluntarily made with full knowledge of the facts, and in the absence of fraud or material mistake of fact or law. 1 Notably, there is a presumption that payments are voluntary. 2 Thus, to rebut the presumption, the plaintiff must show that he/she protested the payment. In order for a protest to be effective, it must be in writing and (with some exceptions, as discussed below) made at the time of
admin
Oct 17, 20229 min read
SUBCONTRACTOR TO UNLICENSED GENERAL CONTRACTOR NOT PERMITTED TO MAKE CLAIM DIRECTLY AGAINST HOMEOWNER
By Jonathan H. Freiberger Municipalities generally require home improvement contractors to be licensed to perform work. “Where a home improvement contractor is not properly licensed in the municipality where the work is performed at the time the work is performed, the contractor forfeits the right to recover for the work performed, both under the contract and on a quantum meruit basis.” Brightside Home Improvements, Inc. v. Northeast Home Improvement Services , 208 A.D.3d 4
admin
Oct 14, 20224 min read
Out-of-pocket Fraud Damages: Proof Required to Determine the Value of Restricted Securities
By: Jeffrey M. Haber Since the early 20th century, a plaintiff alleging fraud in New York can recover only the actual pecuniary loss sustained as a result of a misrepresentation or omission, i.e. , the plaintiff’s out-of-pocket damages. 1 The damages recoverable under the out-of-pocket rule are intended to compensate plaintiffs for what they lost because of the fraud, not for what they might have gained. 2 The out-of-pocket rule was at issue in Danco Enters., LLC v. Livexliv
admin
Oct 11, 20225 min read
SPOLIATION OF EVIDENCE
By Jonathan H. Freiberger Section 3101 of the CPLR provides that, in general, “there should be full disclosure of all matter material and necessary in the prosecution or defense of an action, regardless of the burden of proof” by, inter alia , a party and its representatives. “Material and necessary” is “to be interpreted liberally to require disclosure, upon request, of any facts bearing on the controversy which will assist preparation for trial by sharpening the issues an
admin
Oct 7, 20225 min read
bottom of page
