top of page
All Posts
No Damages, No Claim, Problem
By: Jeffrey M. Haber It is axiomatic that a plaintiff cannot succeed on his or her cause of action if there are no provable damages. It is, therefore, important that the plaintiff plead and prove each element of the claim, including the damages element. After all, damages are “an essential element” 1 of any tort cause of action. 2 This basic tenant of law was at the heart of Mohinani v. Charney , 3 a case in which plaintiff failed to prove damages resulting from defendants’
admin
Aug 3, 20225 min read
Enforcement News: SEC Charges Broker-Dealers/Investment Advisers With Deficiencies Relating to the Prevention of Customer Identity Theft
By: Jeffrey M. Haber The growth of information technology and electronic communication over the past few decades has made it increasingly easy to collect, maintain, and transfer personal information. 1 With the advancement of technology, the public faces repeated threats to the integrity and privacy of their personal information. The federal government has taken steps to help protect individuals, and to help individuals protect themselves, from the risks of theft, loss, and
admin
Aug 1, 20226 min read
Enough Already With RPAPL 1304
By Jonathan H. Freiberger This Blog frequently covers the pre-foreclosure notice requirements of RPAPL 1304 . See, e.g. , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> and < here =">here</a>"> . While this stuff is interesting, it also happens to be the subject of frequen
admin
Jul 29, 20224 min read
Willful Exaggeration under Lien Law 39-a
By Jonathan H. Freiberger Laborers and material suppliers (collectively, “Providers”) that add value to construction projects should be paid for their work by the owner, general contractor or whoever else brought them to the project in the first instance. If Providers do not receive payment despite their own performance, several remedies are available. For example, a simple claim for breach of contract may be brought by an unpaid Provider. Such remedies, however, may be in
admin
Jul 22, 20226 min read
The Arbitrator, Not The Court, Decides Questions of Contract Validity
By: Jeffrey M. Haber It is well-settled that the arbitration provisions of the Civil Practice Law and Rules (CPLR § 7501 et seq .) evidence a legislative intent to encourage arbitration. 1 In fact, arbitration is a preferred means for the settlement of disputes between parties. 2 In light of the foregoing, (1) when parties to a contract have clearly and unambiguously agreed to arbitrate their disputes, the courts will enforce that agreement, as they would any other agreement
admin
Jul 20, 20223 min read
Tolling and The Continuing Wrong Doctrine
By: Jeffrey M. Haber A recurring question that courts and litigants often encounter is how to apply the continuing wrong doctrine to a statute of limitations. Statutes of limitations restrict the time within which a defendant can be held liability for all types of alleged wrongdoing. Plaintiffs who do not pursue their rights within the limitations period will find the courthouse doors closed to their claims. For this reason, whether the statute of limitations has run is an i
admin
Jul 18, 20228 min read
Not Another Article on RPAPL 1304
By Jonathan H. Freiberger I say it all the time and I’m going to say it again, the readers of this Blog know that we frequently discuss numerous aspects of residential mortgage litigation. S ee, e.g., < here =">here</a>"> and the articles linked therein. A related subtopic that gets much attention in this Blog is the pre-foreclosure notice requirements of RPAPL 1304 . See, e.g. , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> ,
admin
Jul 15, 20226 min read
Fraud, Group Pleading and Particularity
By: Jeffrey M. Haber In Yunjie Yang v. Knights Genesis Group , 2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 32126(U) (Sup. Ct., N.Y. County July 6, 2022) ( here ), the court was asked to consider various matters associated with the particularity requirement for pleading fraud. In this regard, by the court examined the group pleading doctrine and the specificity needed to maintain a fraud claim. The motion court was also asked to consider alter ego liability and the factual bases for piercing the corpo
admin
Jul 13, 20227 min read
COVID-19, Casualty Loss Clauses, and the Frustration of Purpose Doctrine
By: Jeffrey M. Haber It has been more than two years since the start of the global pandemic. In the early days of the pandemic, many states imposed emergency measures to address the health crisis – measures that had the effect of reducing business operations or shutting down the business. New York was no different. Among the measures implemented were government-mandated closures. For retailers this meant the loss of business. With business shutdown, or substantially curtailed
admin
Jul 11, 20226 min read
bottom of page
