top of page
All Posts
Freiberger Haber’s Co-Founding Partners Once Again Recognized By Super Lawyers Magazine
Melville, NY ( Law Firm Newswire ) October 15, 2021 - Freiberger Haber LLP is pleased to announce that co-founding partners, Jonathan H. Freiberger and Jeffrey M. Haber, have been named by Super Lawyers magazine to be among the top lawyers in the New York metropolitan area. This is Mr. Freiberger’s second, and Mr. Haber’s tenth, consecutive year of selection. Both Messrs. Freiberger and Haber were recognized for their work in business litigation. Super Lawyers Magazine® is a
admin
Oct 18, 20212 min read
The First Department Reiterates the “Strict Nature” of “Notice -to-Cure” Provisions in Construction Contracts
By Jonathan H. Freiberger Many contracts contain provisions requiring that in the event of a default, one party must provide to the other notice of the purported default and an opportunity to cure before the valuable rights under the contract can be terminated. In general “ he purpose of a Notice to Cure is to specifically apprise the of claimed defaults in its obligations under the and of the forfeiture and termination of the if the claimed default is not cured within a
admin
Oct 13, 20214 min read
First Department Holds Letter Agreement with Releases, Disclaimers and Waivers of Information Bars Fraud-Based Claims
By: Jeffrey M. Haber In prior articles, we discussed the impact a disclaimer clause in a contract can have on a fraud claim. See , e,g. , here . Namely, a disclaimer clause can preclude a fraud claim when (1) the disclaimer is specific to the fact alleged to be misrepresented or omitted; and (2) the alleged misrepresentation or omission does not concern facts peculiarly within the knowledge of the non-moving party. 1 Disclaimer clauses often are worded as “no reliance” claus
admin
Oct 6, 20219 min read
Contract Reformation: Mutual Mistake or A Scrivener’s Error
By: Jeffrey M. Haber As a general matter, when a contract fails to conform to the agreement between the parties due to the mutual mistake of the parties however induced, or of the mistake of one party and fraud of the other, a court will reform the contract so as to make it conform to the actual agreement between the parties. 1 The mutual mistake must be material ( i.e. , it must involve a “fundamental assumption” of the contract). 2 However, it does not mean that the mist
admin
Oct 4, 20215 min read
In Case of First Impression Amongst New York Appellate Courts, The Second Department Holds That Foreclosing Lender Must Send a Separate RPAPL 1304 90-Day Notice to Each Borrower as a Condition Prec...
By Jonathan H. Freiberger In this Blog, we frequently write about cases and developments related to mortgage foreclosure, in general, and RPAPL 1304, specifically. Indeed, in our September 24, 2021, blog < here =">here</a>"> we discussed the importance of submitting sufficient proof of compliance with RPAPL 1304 on a motion for summary judgment and hyperlinked to prior related articles. By way of brief background, and as set forth in prior articles, in general, a foreclosin
admin
Oct 1, 20216 min read
CPLR 1015(a) and the Death of a Party
By: Jeffrey M. Haber Litigation can be a long and drawn-out process. Indeed, it is not uncommon for lawsuits to go on for years before they reach their conclusion. Sometimes during the pendency of a lawsuit, one or more of the parties dies. When that happens, the court is divested of jurisdiction to conduct proceedings in the action until a proper substitution has been made pursuant to CPLR § 1015(a). 1 Any order rendered after the death of a party and before the substituti
admin
Sep 29, 20212 min read
The Importance of Complying With Court Orders
By: Jeffrey M. Haber Default judgments are a part of litigation. In New York, a default judgment may be entered “ hen a defendant has failed to appear, plead or proceed to trial of an action reached and called for trial, or when the court orders a dismissal for any other neglect to proceed, ….” 1 The consequences of a default can be severe. Among other things, it allows the prevailing party to enforce the judgment using all the tools available under Article 52 of the CPLR.
admin
Sep 27, 20213 min read
Another Judgment of Foreclosure and Sale Reversed Due to Lender’s Failure to Lay Bare Sufficient Proof of Compliance with RPAPL 1304
By Jonathan H. Freiberger This Blog frequently analyzes residential mortgage foreclosure issues. See, e.g., < here =">here</a>"> and the articles hyperlinked therein. As relates specifically to today’s article, we have frequently focused on the pre-foreclosure notice requirements of RPAPL 1304 . < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> . In general, and as discussed in previous
admin
Sep 24, 20215 min read
Second Department Addresses Issues Regarding Proof of Value of Foreclosed Property for the Purpose of Calculating Deficiency Judgment Under RPAPL 1371
By Jonathan H. Freiberger Mortgages are commonly delivered to lenders as security for the repayment of financial obligations, which, in many cases, are evidenced by promissory notes. If borrower defaults, lender can sue on the note or foreclose the mortgage, but not both simultaneously. See RPAPL 1301 . [Eds. Note: this Blog has addressed a lender’s election of remedies < here =">here</a>"> and < here =">here</a>"> .] When real property is sold at a foreclosure sale, the
admin
Sep 20, 20216 min read
bottom of page
