top of page
All Posts
First Department Finds Fraud Claim Duplicative of Contract Claim Even Though Plaintiff Stated A Duty Independent of The Contract
A “recurring question” New York courts grapple with is whether the facts alleged in a complaint give rise to claims for both breach of contract and fraudulent inducement. Cronos Grp. v. XComIP, LLC , 156 A.D.3d 54, 56 (1st Dept. 2017). Readers of this Blog know that a fraud claim, which “ar from the same facts , s identical damages and d not allege a breach of any duty collateral to or independent of the parties’ agreements<,> is subject to dismissal as redundant of the c
admin
Apr 21, 20215 min read
Broad Release Reaching “Any and All Claims,” Whether “Known or Unknown” Sufficient to Bar Claims For The Recovery of Money
When a person releases another from claims or the threat of claims, he/she is giving up the right to sue the other in connection with the subject of the release. Centro Empresarial Cempresa S.A. v América Móvil, S.A.B. de C.V. , 17 N.Y.3d 269, 276 (2011) (“Generally, a valid release constitutes a complete bar to an action on a claim which is the subject of the release.”). A release effectively eliminates all claims against another that are possessed by the party giving the re
admin
Apr 19, 20216 min read
Enforcement News: SEC Charges Los Angeles-Based Actor and His Company with Operating a $690 Million Ponzi Scheme
It has been over 100 years since Charles Ponzi was indicted for the fraudulent scheme that bears his name. In a Ponzi scheme, the operator creates an investment program in which “profits” are paid to earlier investors with money taken from later investors. The “profits” are, therefore, fictitious instead of returns on investment. Ultimately, Ponzi schemes collapse under their own weight, taking investors, many of whom are the later ones in the scheme, down with them. Unfortun
admin
Apr 14, 20213 min read
Non-arbitrable Matters Inextricably Interwoven with Arbitrable One Sent to Arbitration by First Department
Generally, matters that are not covered by an agreement to arbitrate do not have to be arbitrated. After all, arbitration is a creature of contract. And, because an agreement to arbitrate is governed by the rules of contract interpretation, the courts must “give effect to the contractual rights and expectations of the parties.” Volt Info. Scis., Inc. v. Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior Univ. , 489 U.S. 468, 479 (1989). In other words, “as with any other contract, t
admin
Apr 12, 20214 min read
TAKE NOTICE OF THE NOTICE PROVISIONS IN YOUR MORTGAGE
Promissory notes and mortgages, like many other contracts, frequently contain provisions requiring a non-breaching party to provide the breaching party with notice of their default as a condition precedent to taking any action to enforce rights as a result of the breach. Such action can include, but is not limited to, commencing legal action and/or accelerating the unpaid balance due under the note. Similarly, default notice provisions may require that, in certain circumsta
admin
Apr 9, 20214 min read
Transaction Documents Found Not to Be So Intertwined as To Warrant a Stay of Judgment on A Note
Under well-settled principles, summary judgment in lieu of complaint is available for an instrument for the payment of money only. In considering such a motion, the courts will look at the four corners of the instrument sued upon in determining whether the instrument qualifies as one for the payment of money only. here.=">here</a>."> In Yang v. Dai , 2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 02125 (1st Dept. April 6, 2021) ( here ), the Appellate Division, First Department applied the foregoing pri
admin
Apr 7, 20215 min read
The Parent and The Subsidiary. When is The Former Liable for The Actions of the Latter?
Corporations are legal entities distinct from their managers. As such, like any shareholder or investor, a corporation can buy shares in another corporation. When a corporation buys enough voting shares of another corporation to control that company, a parent - subsidiary relationship is created. Specifically, when a corporation buys less than 100%, but more than 50%, of another company, the latter company becomes a regular subsidiary of the former. If the corporation acquir
admin
Apr 5, 20217 min read
COURT OF APPEALS CERTIFIES TO THE SECOND CIRCUIT THE ANSWER TO, INTER ALIA, THE QUESTION: HOW CAN A BORROWER REBUT A LENDER’S PROOF OF COMPLIANCE WITH RPAPL 1304 WHEN THAT PROOF IS IN THE FORM OF A...
This Blog frequently addresses issues involving mortgage foreclosures in New York. < HERE =">HERE</a>"> , < HERE =">HERE</a>"> < HERE =">HERE</a>"> , < HERE =">HERE</a>"> , < HERE =">HERE</a>"> , < HERE =">HERE</a>"> < HERE =">HERE</a>"> , < HERE =">HERE</a>"> , < HERE =">HERE</a>"> , < HERE =">HERE</a>"> , < HERE =">HERE</a>"> , < HERE =">HERE</a>"> , < HERE =">HERE</a>"> , < HERE =">HERE</a>"> , < HERE =">HERE</a>"> , < HERE =">HERE</a>"> , < HERE =">HERE</a>"> , < HERE
admin
Apr 2, 20218 min read
Enforcement News: “Safe Harbor” Affords Whistleblower Opportunity to Receive An Award Even Though The Tip Was Initially Reported Internally
In 2010, Congress passed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) to combat illegal and fraudulent conduct on Wall Street and promote compliance with the federal securities and commodities laws. The Dodd-Frank Act contains whistleblower provisions that authorize the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or the “Commission”) to pay substantial cash rewards to whistleblowers who voluntarily provide the SEC with information about
admin
Mar 31, 20213 min read
bottom of page
