All Posts

Although New York law does not provide for a single statute of limitations for breach of fiduciary duty or unjust enrichment claims, courts typically determine the applicable limitations period — three years under CPLR § 214 (4) or six years under CPLR § 213(1) — by analyzing the substantive remedy that the plaintiff seeks. IDT Corp. v. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co. , 12 N.Y.3d 132, 139 (2009). Thus, for example, “ here the remedy sought is purely monetary in nature, court

When parties enter into contracts, they generally do so with the expectation of receiving the benefits of their respective bargains.  Hopefully, these expectations are realized when all parties perform.  A party’s failure to perform under a contract frequently results in a claim for breach of contract.  “Generally, once a party to a contract has made a promise, that party must perform or respond in damages for its failure, even where unforeseen circumstances make performance

March 2021 has been a busy month for the Enforcement Division of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or “Commission”). Since our last Enforcement News article ( here ), the SEC has announced six enforcements proceedings and/or settlements involving some type of securities fraud.  The type of conduct addressed by the SEC in these proceedings and/or settlements is varied and limited only by the imagination of those who perpetrated the fraud. Thus, for example, fraudst

Fraud in the sale of securities. Such an allegation is often governed by an arbitration clause, requiring the parties to resolve their dispute before a FINRA tribunal. Not all investment claims, however, require resolution in arbitration. Sometimes the dispute can be adjudicated in a court of law. Such was the case in Pottorff v. Centra Fin. Group, Inc. , 2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 01645 (1st Dept. Mar. 19, 2021 ( here ). Pottorff v. Centra Financial Group, Inc. Background Pottorff

The nature of the equitable remedy of specific performance as related to litigation concerning real estate contracts has been explained by this BLOG < here =">here</a>"> and also addressed, inter alia , < here =">here</a>"> and < here =">here</a>"> .  Suffice it to say, specific performance is an equitable remedy requiring the breaching party to perform under a contract and is frequently awarded in situations where the subject matter of a contract is unique – making an awar

Today, we examine Two Rivers Entities, LLC v. Sandoval , 2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 01527 (1st Dept. Mar. 16, 2021) ( here ), a case involving breach of contract and the faithless servant doctrine.  Before we examine Two Rivers , we discuss the principles of law at issue in the case. Breach of Contract To sustain a breach of contract cause of action, a plaintiff must allege: (1) a valid agreement; (2) the plaintiff’s performance of its obligations under the agreement; (3) the defenda

It has long been the law in New York that a party’s disclaimer of reliance on extra-contractual representations and omissions will not preclude a fraudulent inducement claim unless: (1) the disclaimer is specific to the fact alleged to be misrepresented or omitted; and (2) the alleged misrepresentation or omission does not concern facts peculiarly within the knowledge of the non-moving party. Basis Yield Alpha Fund v. Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. , 115 A.D.3d 128, 137 (1st Dept

Disclosure in New York State court litigation is governed by Article 31 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules .  In general, there “shall be full disclosure of all matters material and necessary in the prosecution or defense of an action, regardless of burden of proof….”  CPLR 3101.   “The words, ‘material and necessary,’ are … to be interpreted liberally to require disclosure, upon request, of any facts bearing on the controversy which will assist preparation for trial by shar

In the past, this Blog has examined cases in which the plaintiff brings a breach of contract claim and fraud claim in the same proceeding. < e.g. , here,=">here</a>," and="and" >here.=">here</a>."> e.g.,> Those cases show that where the two claims arise from the same facts and circumstances and seek the same relief, the fraud claim will be dismissed as duplicative of the contract claim.   Indeed, as this Blog has explained previously, New York courts will not permit a fraud c