top of page
All Posts
COVID-19 Update: New York Courts Reducing In-Court Operations and In-Person Traffic
It goes without saying that the spread of the coronavirus is accelerating across the country. As noted in the lead paragraph of an article posted in yesterday’s online version of the Washington Post, titled “U.S. Surpasses 15 million Coronavirus Cases as Spread Accelerates” ( here ): It took about 100 days for the United States to record its first 1 million coronavirus cases, and 44 more passed before the country topped 2 million. But now, in the middle of the most severe su
admin
Dec 9, 20204 min read
Enforcement News: The Cheesecake Factory Charged For Issuing Misleading Information About The Impact of COVID-19 On Operations
In prior articles, we have examined enforcement actions (and settlements thereof) brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or “Commission”) involving false statements about the subject companies and COVID-19. ( E.g. , here .) Those actions involved micro-cap companies and the products they claimed to offer to address the pandemic. As we noted in those articles, there was a common thread between the actions – they involved pump and dump schemes in which the com
admin
Dec 7, 20205 min read
“TO THE VICTOR BELONGS THE SPOILS” -- UNLESS RULE 202.48 OF THE UNIFORM CIVIL RULES FOR THE SUPREME COURT AND THE COUNTY COURT GETS IN YOUR WAY
According to Wikipedia, New York Senator William L. Marcy coined the phrase “to the victor belong the spoils” when “referring to the victory of Andrew Jackson in the election of 1828.” In certain situations, however, the failure of a litigant to act quickly when the Court issues a favorable decision on a motion could spoil the “spoils.” Sometimes the Court renders a decision on a motion instead of issuing an order or judgment. In such cases it is often up to the prevailing
admin
Dec 4, 20204 min read
Misrepresentations Concerning Intent Not to Perform Are Not The Same As Misrepresentations Concerning The Ability to Perform For Duplication Purposes
“A cause of action for fraud does not arise when the only fraud charged relates to a breach of contract.” Krantz v. Chateau Stores of Can. Ltd. , 256 A.D.2d 186, 187 (1st Dept. 1998) (citations omitted). “To plead a viable cause of action for fraud arising out of a contractual relationship, the plaintiff must allege a breach of duty which is collateral or extraneous to the contract between the parties.” Id. (citations and quotation marks omitted). One way to satisfy this re
admin
Dec 2, 20204 min read
New York Court Appeals Holds Liquidated Damages Provision in a Surrender Agreement to Be an Unenforceable Penalty
In Trustees of Columbia Univ. in the City of N.Y. v. D’Agostino Supermarkets, Inc. , 2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 06937 (Nov. 24, 2020) ( here ), the New York Court of Appeals was asked to “consider the propriety of a liquidated damages provision in a Surrender Agreement between two New York City icons: Columbia University, one of the City’s premier universities, and D’Agostino Supermarkets, a family-owned food market chain founded in 1932.” Slip Op. at *1. D’Agostino had leased proper
admin
Nov 30, 202010 min read
Court Holds The McCoys Were On Inquiry Notice of Defendants’ Alleged Fraud
Hang on Sloopy was a hit song in the mid-1960s. Years later, the band that performed and recorded the song – the McCoys – claimed that they were cheated out of substantial sums of money due to fraud. That claim, however, was time-barred, held the Court in Derringer v F.G.G. Prods. Inc. , 2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 33854(U) (Sup. Ct., N.Y. County Nov. 18, 2020) ( here ). Fraud claims must be commenced within “the greater of six years from the date the cause of action accrued or two ye
admin
Nov 25, 20207 min read
First Department Affirms Finding That Transfer of Property to Newly Created Company To Avoid Foreclosure Judgment Fraudulent For Purposes of Former DCL § 276
Sometimes, a case involves facts and circumstances that, on their face, lead a court to determine that a fraud was committed. Such was the case in First Franklin Fin. Corp. v. Merchant , 2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 06852 (1st Dept. Nov. 19, 2020) ( here ). In First Franklin , a judgment debtor transferred property subject to a foreclosure sale to a company that he had formed all on the same day. Such facts and circumstances, said the lower court, represented “badges of fraud” under f
admin
Nov 23, 20204 min read
THE ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE FOR SUFFOLK COUNTY HAS PROMULGATED NEW RULES, EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 23, 2020, TO ADDRESS THE COURT SYSTEM’S RESPONSE TO THE RECENT SURGE IN COVID-19 CASES
On November 4, 2020, this Blog (the “November 4 Blog”) provided an update on the New York State Court system’s preparation for the anticipated surge in COVID-19 cases. On November 18, 2020, Andrew A. Crecca, the District Administrative Judge for the 10 th Judicial District (Suffolk County), circulated a memorandum on “Suffolk County Updated Operating Protocols <“the plan”> Effective November 23, 2020” (the “Memorandum”). As noted in the November 4 Blog, “the country has
admin
Nov 20, 20203 min read
Enforcement News: Investment Advisory Firms and Dually-Registered Broker-Dealers Charged in Connection with Sales of Unsuitable Exchange-Traded Products
Brokerage firms, financial institutions and investment advisers are required to provide suitable investment recommendations and strategies to a customer that are consistent with the customer’s investment objectives, risk tolerance and financial needs. See , e.g. , here and here (FINRA Rule 2111). This requirement is based on the “know your customer” rule ( here (FINRA Rule 2090)), which requires brokerage firms, financial institutions and investment professionals to be awa
admin
Nov 18, 20204 min read
bottom of page
