The Many Facets of a Fraudulent Inducement Claim
- Jan 11 2023
By: Jeffrey M. Haber We start the new year off examining Dragons 516 Ltd. v. Knights Genesis Inv. Ltd., 2023 N.Y. Slip Op. 50020(U) (Sup. Ct., N.Y. County Jan. 6, …
By: Jeffrey M. Haber We start the new year off examining Dragons 516 Ltd. v. Knights Genesis Inv. Ltd., 2023 N.Y. Slip Op. 50020(U) (Sup. Ct., N.Y. County Jan. 6, …
By: Jeffrey M. Haber In ABN AMRO Capital USA LLC v. AMERRA Capital Mgt., LLC, 2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 07178 (1st Dept. Dec. 20, 2022) (here), the Appellate Division, First …
By: Jeffrey M. Haber As readers of this Blog know, we have often written about the justifiable reliance element of a fraud claim. Considered by the courts to be nettlesome,1 …
By: Jeffrey M. Haber “The elements of a cause of action for fraud require a material misrepresentation of a fact, knowledge of its falsity, an intent to induce reliance, justifiable …
By: Jeffrey M. Haber One of the elements of a fraud claim that plaintiffs have difficulty satisfying is justifiable reliance. For this reason, the justifiable reliance element is most often …
By: Jeffrey M. Haber In past articles, we have noted the importance of identifying the statements claimed to be false and misleading. In this regard, we talked about the need …
By: Jeffrey M. Haber One of the elements of a fraud claim that plaintiffs have difficulty satisfying is justifiable reliance. As evident from the reported decisions, the justifiable reliance element …
By: Jeffrey M. Haber In Yunjie Yang v. Knights Genesis Group, 2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 32126(U) (Sup. Ct., N.Y. County July 6, 2022) (here), the court was asked to consider …
By: Jeffrey M. Haber The Duplication Doctrine is well-known to readers of this Blog. In a nutshell, the doctrine holds that “[a] cause of action for fraud does not arise …
By: Jeffrey M. Haber In today’s Fraud Notes, we examine three decisions issued by the Appellate Division, First Department in which themes familiar to readers of this Blog are at …