Category: General Obligations Law 17-105

Court of Appeals Holds that GOL-17-105 is the Sole Statute Governing the Tolling or Revival of the Statute of Limitations for an Action Pursuant to RPAPL §1501(4)

May 27 2022

By Jonathan H. Freiberger On May 24, 2022, the New York Court of Appeals decided Batavia Townhouses, Ltd. v. Council of Churches Hous. Dev. Fund Co., Inc., and held that …

Nov 19 2021

By Jonathan H. Freiberger In this Blog’s article entitled: “Revive a Time-Barred Claim Using § 17-101 of New York’s General Obligations Law,” we discussed the general purpose of statutes of …

Nov 13 2020

This BLOG has previously addressed issues related to Statutes of Limitations. See, among many others, [HERE], [HERE], [HERE], and [HERE]. Earlier this year, this BLOG posted “Revive A Time-Barred Claim …

Copyright ©2022 Freiberger Haber LLP | Disclaimer
Attorney advertisement | Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
425 Broadhollow Road, Suite 416, Melville, NY 11747 | (631) 574-4454
420 Lexington Avenue, Suite 300, New York, NY 10017 | (212) 209-1005
Attorney Website by Omnizant

Category: General Obligations Law 17-105

Court of Appeals Holds that GOL-17-105 is the Sole Statute Governing the Tolling or Revival of the Statute of Limitations for an Action Pursuant to RPAPL §1501(4)

Revive a Time-Barred Claim in a Mortgage Foreclosure Action Using § 17-105(1) of New York’s General Obligation Law

FIRST DEPARTMENT HOLDS THAT LISTING A MORTGAGE DEBT ON A BANKRUPTCY SCHEDULE IS NOT AN ACKNOWLEDGMENT SUFFICIENT TO RESTART AN OTHERWISE EXPIRED STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS UNDER GOL 17-101 OR 17-105(1)