425 Broadhollow Road
Suite 417
Melville, NY 11747

631.282.8985
Freiberger Haber LLP
10 Grand Central
155 East 44th Street, 6th Floor
New York, NY 10017

212.209.1005

FINRA Issues Regulatory Notice Affirming Arbitration Rights

Print Article
  • Posted on: Aug 30 2016

What is a FINRA arbitration?

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) issued a Regulatory Notice in July reminding member firms that customers have a right to request arbitration “at any time.” In addition, the self regulator stated that customers do not forfeit their right to a FINRA arbitration by signing an agreement that calls for another venue. The notice also reiterated that FINRA members cannot require registered representatives and certain employees to waive their right to arbitration in a pre-dispute arbitration agreement. 

FINRA Arbitration at a Glance

The FINRA arbitration forum protects customers from a wide range of practice violations, such as unsuitable investment advice, churning, breach of fiduciary duty and the like. Arbitration is a more expedient and cost effective approach to dispute resolution than a court trial. The process involves selecting a neutral third party, the “arbitrator,” to resolve the dispute. By pursuing arbitration, a customer waives the right to pursue the matter in court and the arbitrator’s decision is final and binding.

The Regulatory Notice is a reminder that failing to comply with the rules concerning arbitration agreements or submitting disputes to a FINRA forum are rules violations that could result in disciplinary actions. The notice serves as a warning to certain firms that have reportedly been including restrictive provisions regarding dispute forums in their arbitration agreements. While these restrictions are more common in disputes between members firms and registered representatives, the real issue in customer disputes tends to be the selection of law.

In a related development, FINRA has also filed a proposed rule with the SEC to amend its code of Arbitration Procedure for Customer Disputes. The goal is to provide a more efficient arbitration process, as well as one that is less costly while maintaining the rights of the parties involved in a dispute. While some observers believe there is a need to make the process more efficient, they also argue that any cost saving should be passed through to customers involved in a dispute resolution proceeding.

Notwithstanding FINRA’s July notice, brokers and investment advisors have a duty to act in a reasonable and prudent manner when acting as a fiduciary and are required to put their customers’ interests first. In the end, a registered representative who becomes embroiled in a dispute with a customer or employer should engage the services of an experienced securities arbitration attorney.

Tagged with:

legal500
bnechmark
superlawyers
AVVO
Freiberger Haber LLP Footer Logo
Copyright ©2020 Freiberger Haber LLP | Disclaimer
Attorney advertisement | Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
425 Broadhollow Road, Suite 417, Melville, NY 11747 | (631) 282-8985
10 Grand Central, 155 East 44th Street, 6th Floor, New York, NY 10017 | (212) 209-1005
Attorney Website by Zola Creative